The major suggestions that the Committee made are as follows:
- Candidates with 50 % or more marks in graduation can only appear for the
exam
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Reduce the age limit: 25 for general, 28 for OBC and 30 for SC/ST
NOT
IMPLEMENTED
- Restrict the number of attempts to 5, irrespective of category.
NOT
IMPLEMENTED
- Personal narrative before the interview. Those selected for the Interview
will be asked to submit a Personal Narrative in advance, which may be
autobiographical, where candidates can briefly discuss their personal
history and reasons for aspiring to join civil services. The aspirant may
also elaborate on their academic, non-academic, and practical experience,
which may help them be a successful civil servant, and discuss their success
or failure in managing specific/unusual situations. The Interview Board
should consider the personal narrative, and specific questions can be asked
from it. Further, fine-tuning the Interview process by structuring the
Interview is necessary for which candidates are awarded marks specifically
on various facets of their personality.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Revise the exam pattern every 5 years Given the current fast changing
scenario, both at the domestic as well as global level, the selection
methodology would require a periodic review once every five years by the
UPSC.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Remove group-B jobs from Civil service exam
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Among the group A jobs, create two separate civil service exams– one for
[IAS, IPS and IRS], while a second separate exam for other remaining group A
jobs.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Do Not allow past-toppers to re-appear in the exam more than once. Once the
candidate is selected for a service and if she/he joins, she/he may be given
only one more chance to re-appear in the examination if she/he is otherwise
eligible for appearing. For this, a candidate may be permitted to leave and
may be allowed to retain his seniority.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Prelim score card should have validity of two years
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Give a specific booklist along with the syllabus.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Three days interview, Group discussion, psychological-profiling similar to
SSB.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Each candidate should be interviewed by “ALL boards” then take an average
score, so there is no bias.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- In the elite Management colleges, one needs to send an “admission-essay”
before the interview. Nigvekar recommended a similar system before UPSC
interviews.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Consolation prize for those who fail in an interview and they should be
given at least some non-gazetted posts or alternative career opportunities.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Service preference can be changed during training A candidate may be allowed
to review their service options within one month of joining the Foundation
Course, and allotment of service and care should be made by the government
before the Foundation Course ends. Counseling for the various services
should be given in the first two weeks of the foundation course.
NOT
IMPLEMENTED
- Detailed Application form should contain elaborate information about each
service. It should explicitly mention the rules about how service/cadre
allocations are made.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Count language marks in final list Marks in Language papers (Paper I and II)
will count for the Grand Tally of Marks based on which merit will be fixed.
A candidate must also obtain qualifying marks in each language paper set by
the Commission to qualify for selection.
NOT IMPLEMENTED
- Double the Language marks for North East candidates In the case of
candidates from the North-Eastern region, who are exempted from appearing in
Indian language paper at present, their marks in English language papers
would be doubled for the parity purpose in the total of effects.
NOT
IMPLEMENTED
- Only graduation related optional subject For this optional subject, the
candidate can choose any of the topics included in a given group of optional
subjects that most closely correlate with the central/core subject(s)
studied at graduation or the subject studied by them at the post-graduation
level. If a candidate holds only a general pass course degree at the
graduate level, they may be allowed to indicate any of the subjects the
University has examined based on which their choice of optional subject can
be exercised. The candidate should then demonstrate their preference for an
optional subject out of the group of subjects that matches or most closely
correlates to their chosen subject studied at the University. In case of any
difficulty or doubt regarding the group of subjects relating to their chosen
subject, the Commission's decision shall be final. However, the Commission
may issue suitable clarification /guidelines in this regard.
NOT
IMPLEMENTED
- Six groups of Optional Subjects
PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED
- Assessment Post-Training After the candidate has completed their training
(including the Foundation course), they will be assessed by the training
institutions. This would include their assessment during the period of
training and their performance in a written examination conducted by the
training institution/academy at the end of training. The marks based on
their overall activity may be added to the marks obtained in the Civil
Services examination for the final determination of intra-service seniority
in the service. A copy of each candidate's annual assessment confidential
roll will be sent to the UPSC for record and analysis every year.
IMPLEMENTED
- Create separate R & D Centre The UPSC should set up a dedicated research
Centre which can exclusively concentrate on research and development at
micro and macro levels to create question bank, online examination,
observing the recruitment process in developed countries etc.
NOT
IMPLEMENTED