The earliest and most important empire to be established in the Indian
subcontinent was the Mauryan Empire. Founded by Chandragupta Maurya in 322 BCE,
the vast Mauryan Empire, ranging from the Oxus valley to the Kaveri delta, was
given a well-knit centralized administration by its rulers. Chandragupta was a
great warrior as well as a capable administrator. In his vast empire, he
established competent and efficient administrative machinery. In organizing his
administration, he was supported by the famous diplomat and politician Kautilya
(also known as Chanakya) who was his guru. Chandragupta political system was
largely based on the ideals outlined in Kautilya’s Arthashastra.[1]
The Arthashastra of Kautilya contains information regarding the Mauryan empire’s
administrative system. Besides, the edicts of Asoka are another important source
that shed light on the centralized administrative system developed by the
Mauryan emperors. Further, we have epigraphical sources, literary sources,
foreign narratives, and archaeological excavation materials about Mauryan
rulers. Mauryan Empire left behind itself a great legacy of centralized
government and administration for the later rulers, which continues to this day;
for example, the Lion Capital of Mauryan king Ashoka, located at Sarnath is
adopted as the national emblem of the Republic of India.
Arthashastra which formed the basis of governance and administration during the
Mauryan period seems to be interested mainly in the socio-economic problems of
the citizens. Despite adhering to previous traditions regarding rulers’ duties
to their subjects, they disregard the sacerdotalism ideals found in the Epics
and Brahmans. The main goal of the Mauryan kings was to find ways to bring about
happiness in society, and they believe that their political powers serve as the
essential foundation for social existence. Arthasastra stipulates chaos in the
absence of a common superior and advocates coercive authority as the foundation
of all governments. A society driven by greed or passion attempts to tyrannize
the weak, and as a result, the government had to suffer. In order to end such a
condition of conflict and violence, Arthashastra argues regal authority is
absolutely necessary, which they obtain when the monarch has sole coercive
power.[2] As the political condition of India in the 4th century BCE
was in great turmoil because of the incompetent Nanda dynasty of Magadha and
Greek invasions in the North-Western, a centralized empire based on a
monarchical form of government was thought essential to be established, by
Chanakya, the author of Arthashastra. Great standing armies came into existence
as evidenced by the Greek writers who speak of the vast armaments of Maghadha
and of the Andhras, the Kalingas, and the Pandyas.[3]
When the Mauryan empire was established in 322 BCE, it developed a very extensive
system of administration to govern the vast territory under its rule. The
Mauryan empire was monarchical and centralized, with the king assisted in
administrative matters by a council of ministers and also by officers. The power
of the state was still diffused, since the Mauryan Empire was divided into a
number of provinces, which were further divided into districts, and elaborate
arrangements were made for both rural and urban administration.[4]
Radhakrishna Pillai highlights valuable insights on the Mauryan Empire
[1] Radha Kumud Mookerji, Chandragupta Maurya And His Times, Motilal Banarsidas, Delhi, 1960.
[2] Narayan Chandra Bandyopadhaya, Development of Hindu Polity and Political Theories, Part I
From the earliest times to the Growth of Imperialist Movement, Messers and Cambray, Calcutta,
1927, p. 267.
[3] Ibid, p. 268.
[4] See Narayan Chandra Bandyopadhaya, Development of Hindu Polity and Political Theories, Part
2, C. O. Book Agency, Calcutta, 1938, pp. 32-33.